Jiya Says

My Humble Analysis on an Article by Zorain Nizamani. This article is being widely read as an observation about generational disengagement. That interpretation is convenient. It is also inaccurate. What the article actually documents is not a generation that chose silence, but a generation that was silenced. There is a meaningful difference between withdrawal and removal, and blurring that line allows responsibility to dissolve into abstraction. Analytically, this is not a crisis of youth apathy. It is a crisis of legitimacy. When authority no longer persuades, it manages. When it no longer convinces, it constrains. History shows this pattern clearly, long before it is named as such. Our generation did not drift away from public life. It was edged out of it. From classrooms where questions became liabilities. From platforms where speech was conditional. From professions where compliance carried fewer risks than integrity. From public discourse where certain truths survived only when dil...

We live in an age where progress feels fast but meaning feels thin. The modern world thrives on the twin engines of capitalism and consumerism, systems that promise abundance, freedom, and opportunity. Yet, as we move faster and own more, a quiet unease grows. Something human, something essential, seems to be slipping away. This article explores the history, logic, and lived reality of capitalism and consumerism, asking one core question:  what happens when having replaces being? The Birth of Capitalism Capitalism wasn’t born overnight. It grew over centuries, from the crumbling of feudal estates to the rise of bustling city markets. When peasants became wage labourers, when ownership shifted from land to capital, the seeds of the modern economic order were planted. Max Weber, in his classic  The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism , suggested that early Protestantism encouraged discipline, productivity, and thrift values that later became the moral backbone of moder...

Introduction The Mandela Effect is a fascinating psychological phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event, fact, or detail differently from how it occurred. Named after Nelson Mandela, many individuals falsely recall him dying in prison during the 1980s, even though he was released in 1990 and passed away in 2013. This phenomenon extends beyond Nelson Mandela and has permeated popular culture, affecting everything from movie quotes to brand logos. In this article, we’ll delve into the roots of the Mandela Effect, explore its implications in pop culture, and uncover why we collectively misremember famous events. Understanding the Mandela Effect Defining the Mandela Effect The Mandela Effect refers to a situation in which a person or a group of people remember something differently from how it occurred. The term was coined by Fiona Broome, who discovered that she, along with many others, believed that Nelson Mandela had died in prison. After realizing their shared false ...

  Introduction In a world where child safety remains a growing concern, one of the most crucial yet sensitive conversations parents and educators must have with children is about good and bad touch. While discussing body autonomy and personal boundaries can be challenging, it is essential for ensuring children's safety and well-being. In Pakistani society, where such topics are often considered taboo, educating children about the difference between good and bad touch becomes even more critical. This comprehensive guide explores the importance of teaching children about good and bad touch, delving into the legal aspects, rights, and case studies relevant to Pakistani society. It also provides practical strategies for initiating age-appropriate conversations that empower children to protect themselves. 1. The Concept of Good and Bad Touch Understanding the difference between good and bad touch is the first step in educating children about body safety. Here’s how to explain it: Good T...

 In today’s world, the conversation surrounding health and wellness is more prominent than ever. Everyone seems to have an opinion on what constitutes a healthy diet, from social media influencers to diet gurus. However, distinguishing between fact and fiction can be challenging with so much information available. Unfortunately, many of the so-called "rules" of healthy eating are based on myths rather than solid science. These misconceptions can lead to unhealthy habits, nutritional imbalances, and even contribute to the very problems they claim to prevent. According to a survey conducted by the International Food Information Council (IFIC) in 2023, 80% of Americans admit to being confused by conflicting information about what to eat and what to avoid, with many falling victim to common diet myths. This confusion isn't just an American issue; it’s a global phenomenon, affecting people’s health decisions worldwide. In the UK, for instance, a report by the British Dietetic ...